![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() It was therefore important to ensure that such disputes would be completed under the old regime. Hence, if a country initiated a domestic investigation or review (or an application by the affected industry had been made but no investigation had been initiated) before that country withdrew from the Anti-Dumping or Subsidies Code, another country could not dispute the findings of the investigation under the WTO Anti-Dumping or Subsidies Agreement. However, Article 18.3 of the WTO Anti-Dumping Agreement, Agreement on Implementation of Article VI of GATT 1994, Annex 1A to WTO Agreement, supra note 1, and Article 32.3 of the WTO Subsidies Agreement, Agreement on Subsidies and Countervailing Measures, id., stipulate that their rules are applicable only to investigations and reviews initiated pursuant to applications made after their entry into force for a WTO member. Uruguay Round is a time to narrow differences, especially between nations of the North and South. 28 A decision on the consequences of withdrawal from the GATT 1947 was presumably unnecessary because a GATT 1947 contracting party that had initiated a dispute against a party that withdrew from the GATT 1947 before the dispute was resolved could always reinitiate the dispute once both parties became WTO members. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |